Provenance by ontos

Upload a VDR.
Get an IC-ready diligence workspace.

Provenance is the PE diligence product powered by ontos. It turns a messy data room into source-cited metrics, ranked risks, contradictions, management requests, and IC memo output your team can actually defend.

Provenance workspace

The PE command center.

Not a chatbot on top of a file tree. Provenance gives each deal team one living workspace for the VDR, diligence workstreams, evidence, risks, requests, and IC output.

IC readiness

Hold pending diligence

The deal is screenable, but clean IC approval is blocked until QoE, customer concentration, capex, and debt support are reconciled.

72%
workspace readiness

Source-backed output

Generated from 143 evidence chunks across 18 files

Documents

18

17 parsed · 1 Not Analyzed

Evidence chunks

143

available for Q&A and memo

IC blockers

4

high-priority asks before approval

Workstream coverage

Where diligence is strong vs. thin

QoEpartial
Commercialpartial
Legalblocked
Debtmissing
Managementpartial
100+

VDR files parsed, chunked, and classified

9

PE workstreams tracked for IC coverage

95%

Material-claim citation target for diligence output

1

Source-cited workspace for the deal team

The problem

The risk is rarely in one PDF.

PE diligence is not a document search problem. It is a relationship problem. The material issue is usually the contradiction between two sources, the dependency across three companies, or the absence of a document everyone assumed existed.

Which revenue claim in the CIM conflicts with the customer files?

Seller story vs. source data

What obligation is buried in the contracts but missing from the model?

Hidden downside risk

Where are supplier, customer, or regulatory exposures concentrated?

Risk invisible in one document

What evidence is missing from the data room that should be there?

Gaps analysts may not know to ask for
Deal intelligence

Give partners the answer,
not another search box.

ontos creates a live deal map: companies, people, contracts, obligations, customers, facilities, lenders, permits, suppliers, and claims. Then it reasons across that map to produce the questions, risks, and source-backed conclusions your team needs to make a decision.

Ranked issue register
Critical deal issues ranked by severity, source confidence, and IC relevance
Contradiction report
Conflicts between the CIM, financials, contracts, customer files, and outside sources
IC-ready brief
A concise investment memo appendix with citations, reasoning, and open diligence asks
Missing evidence list
The documents, confirmations, and diligence requests needed before signing
Before and after

What changes before IC.

Provenance moves the team from manual document review to a cited, decision-ready workspace.

Before ontos
Time to first IC brief: weeks
Manual reading, workstream updates, memo assembly
Risk coverage: what analysts catch
Linear review across folders and disconnected workstreams
Contradictions: found late
CIM, contracts, and models are reconciled manually
IC memo: built from scattered notes
Copy-paste from workstreams with uneven citations
Analyst time: extraction-heavy
Hours spent finding, copying, and reconciling evidence
With ontos
First IC brief: same day
Ranked issues, citations, and open asks generated from the full room
Every material relationship mapped
Entities, obligations, exposures, and dependencies connected
Contradictions surfaced early
Seller narrative checked against source documents and outside data
IC memo: defensible by default
Every claim tied to sources, confidence, and reasoning
Analyst time: judgment-heavy
Teams spend more time on thesis, negotiation, and downside planning
How it works

From messy data room to deal conviction.

The output is not another chatbot answer. It is structured diligence work your team can inspect, defend, and use.

Step 01

Ingest the full deal

Upload the VDR, model, CIM, contracts, customer files, debt schedules, market reports, and outside sources. No data migration.

Step 02

Map the deal

ontos builds a structured deal map of entities, obligations, claims, dependencies, and evidence, then reconciles conflicts across sources.

Step 03

Walk into IC ready

Your team gets a ranked issue register, contradiction report, missing evidence list, and IC-ready brief with citations.

Provenance — sample deal output

// Processing: 214 diligence files + 6 outside sources

// Elapsed: 2h 14m

DEAL MAP BUILT

Entities: 23 Contracts: 67 Obligations: 178

ISSUE REGISTER — RANKED FOR IC

● CRITICAL Revenue dependency — 74% of EBITDA tied to one customer group; renewal language differs from CIM (docs 18, 88, 142)

● CRITICAL Covenant exposure — add-on debt assumption conflicts with minimum liquidity covenant (docs 31, 77, model v4)

● HIGH Management dependency — 6 operating processes founder-owned; no transition plan in management deck

● HIGH Customer churn conflict — CRM export shows 11 lost accounts not reflected in cohort analysis

● MEDIUM Missing evidence — supplier concentration schedule absent from data room

OPEN DILIGENCE ASKS

12 follow-up questions generated for management and counsel

✓ IC brief generated // Ready for Investment Committee

Real results

What ontos finds while analysts are still reading.

Case study — $2.4B deal

Infrastructure platform diligence

Starting from public filings, project announcements, and environmental documents, ontos mapped the project, counterparties, permits, milestones, and obligations before VDR access.

Permit conditions conflicted with the construction milestone schedule
Critical phases depended on a single stakeholder with no backup path
Environmental obligations contradicted assumptions in the operating case
Five issues were confirmed as active internal diligence topics
Result: issue register ready before formal diligence began
Case study — Portfolio intelligence

Portfolio exposure review

A small set of portfolio materials became a connected view of 23 companies. Dependencies that looked ordinary at one company became material when seen across the fund.

47 entities and 43 relationships mapped across the portfolio
8 material exposures identified across companies
Shared supplier dependency surfaced across multiple portcos
Contract terms flagged that conflicted with stated value-creation plans
Board-ready questions generated for operating partners
Portfolio intelligence

One portfolio. One risk map.

Risk rarely respects company boundaries. ontos connects portfolio companies into one intelligence layer so operating partners can see exposures, obligations, and dependencies across the fund.

Cross-portfolio exposure mapping

Shared customers, suppliers, systems, lenders, and regulators surfaced automatically

Covenant and obligation tracking

Monitor debt covenants, reporting duties, renewal windows, and consent rights

Concentration analysis

Customer, supplier, channel, geography, and regulatory concentration across the fund

Exit readiness scoring

Identify which companies are clean, which need remediation, and why buyers will care

Use cases

Platform acquisitionsFind the risk behind the seller story before IC
Add-on diligenceMap integration risks against the platform company
Exit preparationRun vendor diligence before buyers do
Operating partner reviewsTrack value-creation risks across portcos
Why ontos

Other tools search your data. ontos reasons across the deal.

Capability
ontos
VDR AI / RAG tools
Cross-source contradiction detection
Surfaces risks your team did not know to ask about
Ranked issue register with reasoning chains
IC-ready briefs from structured intelligence
Portfolio-level intelligence across companies
Deal and portfolio intelligence compounds over time
Detects missing evidence
Connects all data sources
Isolated, encrypted processing — data not retained
varies
The math

Give analysts more time for judgment.

The largest cost is not software. It is senior talent spending hours extracting, comparing, and re-checking facts instead of building the investment view.

20
560
$18,000
$10K$40K
Annual DD spend
$360K
Estimated savings with ontos
$295K+
Payback period
Deal 1

Built for institutional-grade security

Your deal data stays yours. Always.

SOC 2 compliant
On-prem / your cloud
No data retention
Datasite, iDeals, Intralinks
Encrypted at rest & transit
Data residency controls
Common questions

What PE teams ask us.

We already have a data room provider.

Your VDR stores files. ontos turns those files into a deal map and reasons across them. It sits on top of Datasite, iDeals, Intralinks, SharePoint, Drive, and other sources.

Our analysts are good enough.

Exactly. ontos removes extraction and reconciliation work so analysts spend more time on judgment, thesis, downside planning, and negotiation prep.

How is this different from AI search tools?

Search answers the question you ask. ontos maps the deal first, then finds contradictions, dependencies, and missing evidence you may not know to search for.

Is our deal data safe?

Deal data is isolated, encrypted, not retained, and never used for training. We support private deployment in your cloud with audit trails and role-based access.

We're evaluating multiple tools.

Ask each tool to find a contradiction across the CIM, model, customer files, and contracts, then produce a cited IC-ready brief. That is the test.

Does it work for bolt-on diligence?

Especially well. ontos maps the target against the platform company, surfacing integration risk, customer overlap, contract conflicts, and operational dependencies before close.

Test it on five real sources

Send five sanitized files from a recent or live process. We will return a ranked issue register, contradiction report, missing evidence list, and IC‑ready brief. No commitment.

See the deal clearly.
Before IC.

Bring one data room. We will show you the issues, contradictions, and missing evidence hiding across it.